in reply to RFC Magic::Attach
DOCUMENTATION!
After reading though the examples several times, I think I understand more or less what this does. I shouldn't have to do that.
I vaugely know what magic is, and what the ~ magic vtable is. I had to read over the samples three times before I understood what you're doing there.
It doesn't help that the ~ magic vtable has nothing to do with the "traditional" meaning of magic -- that is, it's never automaticly called.
I wonder how difficult it would be to allow you to set other types of magic to a perl sub, to be able to create partialy-tied things, and other wierd stuff.
Oh, and I think SvREFCNT can be gotten from several other places as well.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: RFC Magic::Attach
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Jan 21, 2003 at 03:52 UTC | |
by theorbtwo (Prior) on Jan 21, 2003 at 04:29 UTC | |
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Jan 21, 2003 at 04:35 UTC | |
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Jan 21, 2003 at 06:32 UTC | |
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Jan 21, 2003 at 09:07 UTC | |
by theorbtwo (Prior) on Jan 21, 2003 at 04:48 UTC |