in reply to Re: Re: SOAP::Lite and uri/urn
in thread SOAP::Lite and uri/urn
That's good you don't get an error. I'm sceptical of this approach though. The parameter name is URI. You mentioned URNs. "SOAPY/Echo" isn't valid as either a URI or as a URN. Either that or it's ok as a relative URI fragment but all in all this just looks fishy to me.
Seeking Green geeks in Minnesota
|
|---|