in reply to Re: Data Validation Tests
in thread Data Validation Tests

An open API is already in the design. Just load the module and refer to it as a 'custom' test. I already have a test module (count and compare) that uses that mechanism because it needed to be able to curry the function.

As for Data::Verify, I have looked at it, but I'm not sure if it's really practical to try to combine them directally. It's still on my "To Be Considered" list.



My code doesn't have bugs, it just develops random features.

Flame ~ Lead Programmer: GMS | GMS

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Data Validation Tests
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 26, 2003 at 20:52 UTC
    Use "Data::Type" instead (was Data::Verify).
    
     - Now "quite" stable api (alpha).
     - 90% of your requested "value types"
     - Documentation extended.
     - Added more tests.
    
    I am always happy about new ideas and contributions via http://www.sf.net/projects/datatype or directly to me. Greetings, Murat (murat.uenalan@cpan.org) </re>