Re: Self-improvement and TMTOWTDI

> The notational difference reads different and thus has a different psychological impact

Yes, it might do that, certainly, but for that matter so does the way you format your code in terms of whitespace and whatnot. The original poster claimed that the variety was "disturbing", but I'm not sure what's disturbing about it.

> I'm afraid there is a problem however, as only one of them involves a block

This is Perl; a statement is a block, yes?

> Well I think your claim "all languages " is a little broad.

That's why I qualified, "that has while loops". Can you name a language that has while loops but does not allow for this construct? (It is now inevitable that someone will step forward and name such a language, but it will probably be one neither of us has ever used.)

> My earlier argument was that it was exactly these extras that do make the language so rich

Oh, I somehow missed that, amongst the other posts. The other poster's point that the variety is disturbing is the one I disagree with really. Sorry for any confusion.

--jonadab

Comment on Re: Self-improvement and TMTOWTDI Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Self-improvement and TMTOWTDI by demerphq (Chancellor) on Jan 28, 2003 at 10:03 UTC
but I'm not sure what's disturbing about it. Some people dont like to make decisions. Choice mandates making decisions. So ditherers probably dither more with perl than with more restrictive languages just because of this. Its probably compounded by the fact that often there is little difference between the options, IME the less difference the harder the choice. As I said however I rejoice in the options. Id rather dither occasionally than have to fight the language to do something I want to do. This is Perl; a statement is a block, yes? Nope. :-) Read perlsyn: Simple statements and perlsyn: Compound statements. The following is a selection of what seemed to me to be relevent paragraphs. Perl, a sequence of statements that defines a scope is called a block. Sometimes a block is delimited by the file containing it (in the case of a required file, or the program as a whole), and sometimes a block is delimited by the extent of a string (in the case of an eval). But generally, a block is delimited by curly brackets, also known as braces. We will call this syntactic construct a BLOCK. Modifiers are considered to be simple statements, as follows `STMT if EXPR STMT unless EXPR STMT while EXPR STMT until EXPR STMT foreach EXPR` [download] Whereas compound statements are scoped as follows `if (EXPR) BLOCK if (EXPR) BLOCK else BLOCK if (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ... else BLOCK LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK continue BLOCK LABEL for (EXPR; EXPR; EXPR) BLOCK LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK continue BLOCK LABEL BLOCK continue BLOCK` [download] The clearest example I can think of is as follows `D:\Development>perl -Mstrict -wle "my $foo=1 if 0; print defined($foo) + ? $foo : 'undef'" undef D:\Development>perl -Mstrict -wle "if ( 0 ) { my $foo=1 } print defin +ed($foo) ? $foo : 'undef'" Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name at -e line 1. Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name at -e line 1. Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.` [download] So the first example uses a simple statement with a modifier. The my declaration is at the highest scoped level (the eval block that the -e represents). Whereas in the second example the my declaration is scoped to the affirmative block in the if. neither of us has ever used.) Heh, or even heard of. :-) And i didnt see your qualifier. Sorry. The other poster's point that the variety is disturbing is the one I disagree with really. Sorry for any confusion. Me too. No prob. :-) --- demerphq my friends call me, usually because I'm late....	[reply] [d/l] [select]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Self-improvement and TMTOWTDI
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Jan 28, 2003 at 10:03 UTC

but I'm not sure what's disturbing about it.

Some people dont like to make decisions. Choice mandates making decisions. So ditherers probably dither more with perl than with more restrictive languages just because of this. Its probably compounded by the fact that often there is little difference between the options, IME the less difference the harder the choice. As I said however I rejoice in the options. Id rather dither occasionally than have to fight the language to do something I want to do.

This is Perl; a statement is a block, yes?

Nope. :-) Read perlsyn: Simple statements and perlsyn: Compound statements. The following is a selection of what seemed to me to be relevent paragraphs.

Perl, a sequence of statements that defines a scope is called a block. Sometimes a block is delimited by the file containing it (in the case of a required file, or the program as a whole), and sometimes a block is delimited by the extent of a string (in the case of an eval).

But generally, a block is delimited by curly brackets, also known as braces. We will call this syntactic construct a BLOCK.

Modifiers are considered to be simple statements, as follows

    STMT if EXPR
    STMT unless EXPR
    STMT while EXPR
    STMT until EXPR
    STMT foreach EXPR
[download]

Whereas compound statements are scoped as follows

    if (EXPR) BLOCK
    if (EXPR) BLOCK else BLOCK
    if (EXPR) BLOCK elsif (EXPR) BLOCK ... else BLOCK
    LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK
    LABEL while (EXPR) BLOCK continue BLOCK
    LABEL for (EXPR; EXPR; EXPR) BLOCK
    LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK
    LABEL foreach VAR (LIST) BLOCK continue BLOCK
    LABEL BLOCK continue BLOCK
[download]

D:\Development>perl -Mstrict -wle "my $foo=1 if 0; print defined($foo)
+ ? $foo : 'undef'"
undef

D:\Development>perl -Mstrict -wle "if ( 0 ) { my $foo=1 }  print defin
+ed($foo) ? $foo : 'undef'"
Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name at -e line 1.
Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name at -e line 1.
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.
[download]

neither of us has ever used.)

Heh, or even heard of. :-) And i didnt see your qualifier. Sorry.

The other poster's point that the variety is disturbing is the one I disagree with really. Sorry for any confusion.

Me too. No prob. :-)

--- demerphq
my friends call me, usually because I'm late....

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]