in reply to A memory efficient hash, trading off speed - does it already exist?
There's not much you're going to do to reduce in-memory costs, I think, without a lot of extra speed hit. Use a DB, as hasn been suggested--Berkeley DB or even a plain NDBM/GDBM file will probably serve you well here.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: A memory efficient hash, trading off speed - does it already exist?
by Elian (Parson) on Feb 07, 2003 at 17:26 UTC |