in reply to Experience for nodes (to display or not)

I've long been of the oppinion that node reps should be publicly viewable. On the one hand, it does create the problem of people voting "with the crowd", and thus making node reps even more meaningless then they now are. On the other hand, node reps give useful information. People downvote nodes with bad information and upvote nodes with good information. That's useful for readers to know.

(In fact, you know how newbies tend to write perl monks discussion nodes suggesting changes to site policy? That was mine. Let the gates open wide was once < -30, IIRC. (It's now at -8, which lends some creadance to node reps being worthless.))


Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).

  • Comment on Re: Experience for nodes (to display or not)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Experience for nodes (to display or not)
by phydeauxarff (Priest) on Feb 06, 2003 at 18:22 UTC
    Personally, I enjoy the Perlmonks Uncertainty Principle
    I don't know the status of a node until I vote and in doing so, impact a change on that node's status
    ;-)