Re: Foxpro DBF module with a stupid name

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Foxpro DBF module with a stupid name by jettero (Monsignor) on Feb 08, 2003 at 17:06 UTC
Well.... your reply certainly explains all my minus votes. :) Answer: I doubt it's superior. I only doubt it because that module already exists. I'm going to look at it and possibly throw out what I've done so far... Though, I would like to point out that dbase dbfs and foxpro dbfs are quite a lot different. Mine is uniquely foxpro based... and I'm presently working ont he index CDX format which should be a huge search advantage as my DBF readers is presenly quite slow for large tables.	[reply]
Re: Re: Foxpro DBF module with a stupid name by jettero (Monsignor) on Feb 08, 2003 at 17:13 UTC
empty? Yes, that explains a lot too! Omg, I've been publishing a blank tgz. rofl I suck x2 double extra. Well, that's fixed. That's probably the whole reason it didn't show up on CPAN too. How embarassing.	[reply]