in reply to Dissallowing AM to create threads
Yes. But when enough people kneejerk together, it's often called "concensus". However, I suspect that you may be in a minority with this particular set of concerns.
Some posts by Anonymous Monks might trip some flamebaiting filters, but consider whether the resulting threads contain anything valuable. Some people might find that it's easier to approach an uncomfortable topic if they go Anonymous. I'm O.K. with that. We have multiple mechanisms for dealing with posts that go over the line. Some Anonymous posts never get approved.
On the specific articles you cite, I found Ignorant Article to be very interesting, even if it got closer to dealing with personalities than I'm generally comfortable with. Likewise, Use perl wisely, not cleverly carries an odor of troll, but some the responses are interesting, and provided me with some new information on companies that use Perl.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Dissallowing AM to create threads
by pfaut (Priest) on Feb 20, 2003 at 20:22 UTC |