in reply to RE: RE: Perl 6 To Be Complete Rewrite (Topaz, Perl, C++ ??)
in thread Perl 6 To Be Complete Rewrite (But Not What You Think)
Well, I'm on their mailing list and there appears to be a fair amount of debate about this. Some want it to be written in C, others say C++, one person mentioned Objective C, there appears to be a fair amount of support for development in a meta-language (oh yeah, that's good: people who want to help have to learn a new language) that gets compiled to C or C++ and others are advocating a "MicroPerl". The latter involves writing Perl 6 in a subset of Perl 5 that will get compiled down to C and optimized by hand where necessary.
All in all, I've seen some really intelligent ideas and some grotesquely stupid ones, but there doesn't seem to be a consensus yet (unless I missed a few e-mails).
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
RE: (Ovid) RE(3): Perl 6 To Be Complete Rewrite (Topaz, Perl, C++ ??)
by cwest (Friar) on Jul 21, 2000 at 23:55 UTC |