in reply to Re: Oddity in UNIVERSAL documentation
in thread Oddity in UNIVERSAL documentation

Thanks for the explanation. Curiosity, do you consider an oddity in the perl documentation a typo or a bug? In hindsight, it seems like the wrong choice in wording in my post. At first I was going to call it a typo but every mention I see of patches says that documentation is needed to complete it so I was thinking it might be more appropriate to call it a bug.

-Lee

"To be civilized is to deny one's nature."
  • Comment on Re: Re: Oddity in UNIVERSAL documentation

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Oddity in UNIVERSAL documentation
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Feb 24, 2003 at 11:11 UTC
    I'd be inclined to call it incomplete ;)(aka bug) it is certainly not a typo.

    MJD says you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!
    I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6x+5.8x. I take requests.
    ** The Third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom