in reply to S And M -- modifiers, that is...
I also don't see how it adds anything to the book (it's just a more long-winded explanation of what the book already clearly explains)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: S And M -- modifiers, that is...
by Cody Pendant (Prior) on Feb 25, 2003 at 21:47 UTC |