in reply to Re: Re: Specializing in a field
in thread Speicilizing a field
Rereading this, I should note that diotalevi's post was in all probability just a slightly careless joke and my response was a bit overboard. The main problem is the fact that a well intentioned question was removed because of very minor language errors.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Specializing in a field
by diotalevi (Canon) on Feb 26, 2003 at 16:03 UTC |