in reply to Re: Re: Specializing in a field
in thread Speicilizing a field

Rereading this, I should note that diotalevi's post was in all probability just a slightly careless joke and my response was a bit overboard. The main problem is the fact that a well intentioned question was removed because of very minor language errors.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Specializing in a field
by diotalevi (Canon) on Feb 26, 2003 at 16:03 UTC

    Careless? Thoughtless? Both of those apply. I thought a bit about that this morning and what I didn't realize at the time was I wasn't being respectful of whoever originally posted that node.


    Seeking Green geeks in Minnesota