It need to be installed. For a programmer that is developing a site, is easier to send the files to the server, than install apache. But is easiest if it can run HPL docs, from HPL. without the need of 3rd parts. And I have designed HPL to be very independent of 3rd part modules or apps.
But Apache is the final target, since for me it's the best server (but works in other servers, you just need Perl). And your HPL docs work inside mod_perl, that is even better! ;-P
Graciliano M. P.
"The creativity is the expression of the liberty". | [reply] |
If you can click an OK button installing Apache on Win32 is not too hard cause that's about all you absolutely have to do. You will then have an intranet at localhost and a cgi-bin at /Program Files/Apache Group/Apache/cgi-bin. If you get indigo perl you will get Apache installed by default. If you plan to use Apache in the end why not develop for it from the start?
cheers
tachyon
s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print
| [reply] |
First, I'm not cuting the option of the use of Apache.
But you need to ask this to the developers, not me! I just developed HPL. They tell that Apache is to big to download, and let the machine slow on Win32 when running (well I think that some peoples need new machines).
And I don't have groups only in the internal office. I have some groups in projects that are in virtual offices, through the Internet. HPL::HTTPD is a good option if you only have a laptop.
Well, how Darwing say: "Let the natural selection make the best chose". They don't want Apache (for now). ;-P
Observe the options that the other peoples do is a interesting way to make choices, and try to fix problems. I'm just fixing one.
Graciliano M. P.
"The creativity is the expression of the liberty".
| [reply] |