in reply to Re: falling through cases?
in thread falling through cases?

Hm? Unless I'm missing something, that leaves out the part that's relevant to this thread of how to best code the case fall-through thing in Perl.

If the input is not a multiple of 12 bytes, it needs to do this (from the original C version):

switch(len) /* all the case statements fall through */ { case 11: c+=((ub4)k[10]<<24); case 10: c+=((ub4)k[9]<<16); case 9 : c+=((ub4)k[8]<<8); /* the first byte of c is reserved for the length */ case 8 : b+=((ub4)k[7]<<24); case 7 : b+=((ub4)k[6]<<16); case 6 : b+=((ub4)k[5]<<8); case 5 : b+=k[4]; case 4 : a+=((ub4)k[3]<<24); case 3 : a+=((ub4)k[2]<<16); case 2 : a+=((ub4)k[1]<<8); case 1 : a+=k[0]; /* case 0: nothing left to add */ } mix(a,b,c);
And you left out the $c += $length (using 32-bit integer overflow).

Hmm again... or is the . (chr(0)x11), $p, 12 taking the place of that, to fill out the last "gulp"?

So even if that's not quite right, your answer to how to write such a switch statement is "don't. a more natural way (at a higher level in the algorithm) in Perl suggests itself and prevents the need".

Back to the other thread: thanks for sharing fastest implementation of the mix() function you found in pure Perl.