Re**2: use AnyGUI

Well, you can ofcourse support more advanced features, but it means that for GUI-frameworks that do not natively support such a feature the author of "AnyGUI" would have have implement this using the capabilities that are available.

This is however obviously a rather tedious job and makes AnyGUI a very complex project.

Comment on Re**2: use AnyGUI

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re**2: use AnyGUI by webfiend (Vicar) on Mar 01, 2003 at 21:36 UTC
This sounds a bit like the approach taken by wxWindows. It interfaces to GTK, motif, the Windows API, and OS X (I think). Anything that one or the other can't do is implemented directly by wxWindows. So everybody gets a high-functioning almost native toolkit. Pretty sweet. Too bad I haven't been able to get wxPerl to compile, but that's just me :-) I just realized that I was using the same sig for nearly three years.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re**2: use AnyGUI
by webfiend (Vicar) on Mar 01, 2003 at 21:36 UTC

This sounds a bit like the approach taken by wxWindows. It interfaces to GTK, motif, the Windows API, and OS X (I think). Anything that one or the other can't do is implemented directly by wxWindows. So everybody gets a high-functioning almost native toolkit. Pretty sweet.

Too bad I haven't been able to get wxPerl to compile, but that's just me :-)

I just realized that I was using the same sig for nearly three years.

[reply]