finni has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
Results are:use Date::EzDate; $now = Date::EzDate->new("feb 28 2003 10:59 PM"); $i=0; while ($i<120) { print("$now->{'epochday'}, $now->{'full'} \n"); $i++; $now->{'epochsecond'}+=1; }
I've tried this with 'adjust for DST' turned on and off, no change. I'm running Windows 2000 SP3, ActivePerl Build 631. I've had the same results on three similarly configure machines. I've checked SuperSearch here, and the mailing lists on Activestate.com. Any ideas, or other things I could check? Maybe something not using EzDate?12112, Fri Feb 28, 2003 22:59:57 12112, Fri Feb 28, 2003 22:59:58 12112, Fri Feb 28, 2003 22:59:59 12113, Fri Feb 28, 2003 23:00:00 12113, Fri Feb 28, 2003 23:00:01 12113, Fri Feb 28, 2003 23:00:02
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Possible bug (or my misconfiguration) in Date::EzDate 1.04?
by mikosullivan (Novice) on Mar 03, 2003 at 18:51 UTC | |
|
Re: Possible bug (or my misconfiguration) in Date::EzDate 1.04?
by Thelonius (Priest) on Mar 03, 2003 at 18:24 UTC | |
|
Re: Possible bug (or my misconfiguration) in Date::EzDate 1.04?
by finni (Beadle) on Mar 03, 2003 at 16:04 UTC | |
|
Re: Possible bug (or my misconfiguration) in Date::EzDate 1.04?
by traveler (Parson) on Mar 03, 2003 at 17:08 UTC | |
by VSarkiss (Monsignor) on Mar 03, 2003 at 18:18 UTC |