Re: Re: Re: time as number

But surely you've forced scalar context on it there by making it a string. What happens if you just do "print localtime"? And anyway, who needs localtime anyway. You can just do it with time and local it, again, later when you need your human-readable format.
--

“Every bit of code is either naturally related to the problem at hand, or else it's an accidental side effect of the fact that you happened to solve the problem using a digital computer.”
M-J D

Comment on Re: Re: Re: time as number

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: time as number by demerphq (Chancellor) on Mar 04, 2003 at 09:12 UTC
But surely you've forced scalar context on it there by making it a string. What happens if you just do "print localtime"? You would end up sorting by second first etc... And reversing it doesn't help. Don't forget that localtime() returns `($sec,$min,$hour,$mday,$mon,$year,$wday,$yday,$isdst) = localtime(time +);` [download] in list context. You can just do it with time and local it, again, later when you need your human-readable format. Yup. That works much better. ;-) Although personally I find that YYYYMMDDHHMMSS can be a quite useful representation of time. --- demerphq	[reply] [d/l] [select]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Re: time as number
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Mar 04, 2003 at 09:12 UTC

But surely you've forced scalar context on it there by making it a string. What happens if you just do "print localtime"?

You would end up sorting by second first etc... And reversing it doesn't help. Don't forget that localtime() returns

($sec,$min,$hour,$mday,$mon,$year,$wday,$yday,$isdst) = localtime(time
+);
[download]

You can just do it with time and local it, again, later when you need your human-readable format.

Yup. That works much better. ;-) Although personally I find that YYYYMMDDHHMMSS can be a quite useful representation of time.

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]