in reply to Confirming what we already knew
C's a lot more limited, and as such can make more assumptions at compile time, which can generate better code, and that's just fine. (Plus, of course, there's been far more work on any C compiler's optimizer than on perl's optimizer, which can make a pretty darned big difference)
Really does look like you did the appropriate thing--used perl for a fast knock-together project, and moved to a faster language when it turned out to be necessary. FWIW, I don't think you'd have seen much, if any, speed win from going with Java. The cost of moving to Java from perl would've been about the same as moving to C, and C's definitely much faster than Java...
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Confirming what we already knew
by AssFace (Pilgrim) on Mar 05, 2003 at 21:55 UTC | |
by Elian (Parson) on Mar 06, 2003 at 14:57 UTC |