in reply to Re: Re: Re^4: Confirming what we already knew (it's cached)
in thread Confirming what we already knew
Agreed. Though it does take a fair amount of reading to understand the output I find. diotalevi put me on to Perl Guts Illustrated, which has been a great help as I always have a pile of scraps of paper next to me with sketches and tables scribbled all over them when I am programming. Despite the fact that I have no aptitude artistically, I seem to have a visually oriented brain.
However, I'm a little confused by what your example was illustrating?
C:\test>perl -MDevel::Peek -we "$a=1.2;Dump($a);$b="$a";Dump($a)" Name "main::b" used only once: possible typo at -e line 1. SV = NV(0x1bc58c0) at 0x1bd2a50 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (NOK,pNOK) NV = 1.2 SV = NV(0x1bc58c0) at 0x1bd2a50 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (NOK,pNOK) NV = 1.2
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re^4: Confirming what we already knew (it's cached)
by hv (Prior) on Mar 05, 2003 at 21:39 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 05, 2003 at 21:52 UTC |