Re: Re: Determing what part of a regex matched.

Thanks everyone for your responses.

To clarify I didn't say that I will not use Y or Z. If these are my only two hoices I'll pick one and go with it. I was hoping that (and desperately seeking) there is a happy medium that I'm missing because both have their issues. As I understand it using multiple regexs to evalute one string is less efficient then one. Besides having some bad experiences with ?{ } having is marked as "highly experimental, and may be changed or deleted without notice" in the Perldocs doesn't inspire confidence.

Comment on Re: Re: Determing what part of a regex matched.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Determing what part of a regex matched. by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Mar 06, 2003 at 06:57 UTC
As I understand it using multiple regexs to evalute one string is less efficient then one. Well, it would be comparing multiple simple regexes that won't backtrack versus a single more complex one that will often backtrack. So, while it might be less efficient, it won't be as bad as you think it is. Besides, do you really have to worry about this? Are you doing the parsing in a thight loop? Did you benchmark the two alternatives? You didn't show the code of both ways, did you actually try them? Is the rest of your program finished and peephole optimizations are now being called for? Abigail	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Determing what part of a regex matched.
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Mar 06, 2003 at 06:57 UTC

As I understand it using multiple regexs to evalute one string is less efficient then one.

Well, it would be comparing multiple simple regexes that won't backtrack versus a single more complex one that will often backtrack. So, while it might be less efficient, it won't be as bad as you think it is. Besides, do you really have to worry about this? Are you doing the parsing in a thight loop? Did you benchmark the two alternatives? You didn't show the code of both ways, did you actually try them? Is the rest of your program finished and peephole optimizations are now being called for?

Abigail

[reply]