in reply to Re: UDP bidirectional client
in thread UDP bidirectional client

I have a few notes, I'll be not too rigorous in terminology anyway:

Maybe you are trying to say is that the concept of connection is meaningless in UDP: packets that flow from a client to a server and those that flow in the opposite direction are, in some way, unrelated. I mean: in a TCP connection a channel is established and a client and a server communicate over that channel; in UDP a client sends a "message" to a server and closes, and the server sends a "message" to a client and closes: no complicated checks, no connections.

Ciao!
--bronto


The very nature of Perl to be like natural language--inconsistant and full of dwim and special cases--makes it impossible to know it all without simply memorizing the documentation (which is not complete or totally correct anyway).
--John M. Dlugosz

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: UDP bidirectional client
by pg (Canon) on Mar 06, 2003 at 18:27 UTC
    Yes, that’s what I mean. and thanks for adding the detail explanation ;-)

    I even checked RFC 793, and through out the spec, they never used the notion of client/server. I should use those tech terms more carefully, and use them according to their conventional meanings ;-)