in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: An obfuscation script, and a question
in thread An obfuscation script, and a question

This might only be changed if some cryptographic techniques become available, allowing to run an application in an untrusted environment without leaking information on the algorithm (I am not able to find relevant links at the moment, but it's an active field of research).
No, actually that doesn't work. Its just a high level of obfuscation. All that does is put the code into a package, include the unpackager along with the appropriate secret to unlock the package. All you could hope for as the author was that you'd been clever enough so that enough attackers were deterred.

Its just a higher wall - You can still go over it or find ways around it.


Seeking Green geeks in Minnesota

  • Comment on Re^5: An obfuscation script, and a question

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re^5: An obfuscation script, and a question
by abell (Chaplain) on Mar 14, 2003 at 13:57 UTC

    No, actually that doesn't work. ... All that does is ...
    Your that is not the same as my cryptographic techniques. I was hinting at something more along the lines of homomorphic encryption, which on second thought doesn't seem appliable to the settings we are considering, since the output of the encrypted program is itself encrypted. Thus, your customer would not be able to understand the algorithm, but would also be unable to understand the result, which might cause you some problems ;)

    During my google-surfing, I found the paper On the (Im)possibility of Obfuscating Programs, dating 2001, which while implying that "perfect" obfuscators do not exist, doesn't rule out the existance of obfuscators working in practice or under theoretically relaxed hypothesis. The field seems open to improvement.

    Antonio

    The stupider the astronaut, the easier it is to win the trip to Vega - A. Tucket