in reply to Re: Re: Variable scope in ternary ?: operator not propagating?
in thread Variable scope in ternary ?: operator not propagating?

I suspect it will be by way of one of the new pseudopackages - as an educated guess, since all blocks are really closures in Perl 6, I'd say CALLER::. So my $x = $CALLER::x; will probably do that.

Or I may be entirely wrong. :-)

Makeshifts last the longest.