in reply to BerkeleyDB vs. Linux file system

Benchmarking aside, I'm supposing that you don't mind being forced into a programmatic mode of access for the files in question while using BerkleyDB? In other words, there's no reason to access the files in question with something as mundane as vi?

That's a huge consideration for me. As an example of how to go terribly wrong with this, consider what IBM did with AIX -- all system configuration files were mirrored in a database. As a consequence, most unix system configuration commands had an AIX-centric version that would ensure the database was synchronized with the flat files. Yuck.

Matt

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: BerkeleyDB vs. Linux file system
by diotalevi (Canon) on Mar 18, 2003 at 20:20 UTC

    The focus here is file systems as a database, not databases as a file system. I completely agree that it would be foolhardy to put your configuration data into a database of any kind without some sort of good reason (and definately not anything /etc-like).