in reply to XML probabilistic trees
I wouldn't bet a lot on someone here knowing what you mean by "training probabilistic trees". Can you be more verbose about what kind probabilistic tree that is and what you're trying to train?
At any rate, for any of your XML processing needs, XML::Twig is always worth a look.
Makeshifts last the longest.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: XML probabilistic trees
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 23, 2003 at 14:29 UTC | |
by dakkar (Hermit) on Mar 23, 2003 at 15:03 UTC | |
by matth (Monk) on Mar 25, 2003 at 10:13 UTC | |
by dakkar (Hermit) on Mar 25, 2003 at 11:49 UTC |