in reply to licensing perl code
I would go ahead and have your legal department write up a license that meets the financial needs of the client. Make sure you cast the license not as a "pay me continuously for source code". Instead, cast it as "Pay me once for source code and pay me continuously for updates and support".
The difference is licensing the after-sale relationship, not the sale itself. Remember - no-one who's smart will ever get code without a support license, regardless of how implicit it is. That's why RedHat has a growing business, even though they give away their Linux distro.
------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.
Don't go borrowing trouble. For programmers, this means Worry only about what you need to implement.
Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: licensing perl code
by marvell (Pilgrim) on Apr 10, 2003 at 08:32 UTC | |
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Apr 10, 2003 at 08:52 UTC | |
by marvell (Pilgrim) on Apr 10, 2003 at 14:40 UTC | |
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Apr 10, 2003 at 15:14 UTC | |
by marvell (Pilgrim) on Apr 11, 2003 at 14:04 UTC | |
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Apr 10, 2003 at 14:26 UTC |