I should have been clearer. I wasn't suggesting it was the same implementation-wise, just that it would allow you to get a lexical given it's name.

Though I know you can play with lexicals currently (I've done my share of poking trying to get lazy iterators to work via poking contexts in the caller's scope.) I wonder how %MY will work when continuations and what not come into play.

-Lee

"To be civilized is to deny one's nature."