Re: Phone reg expression

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(jeffa) 2Re: Phone reg expression by jeffa (Bishop) on Apr 18, 2003 at 17:36 UTC
Hi particle. Regexp::Common was going to be my suggestion, but i can't figure out what `Regexp::Common::URI::tel` wants (or if that is even the right class to use): `use Regexp::Common qw /URI/; while (<DATA>) { /$RE{URI}{tel}/ and print "$_ contains a telephone URI.\n"; } __DATA__ 555-5555 555-555-5555 (555) 555-5555` [download] any thoughts? anyone? :) jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Phone reg expression by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Apr 18, 2003 at 22:54 UTC
tel:+12345 tel:+358-555-1234567 tel:456-7890;phone-context=213 tel:456-7890;phone-context=X-COMPANY-NET tel:+1-212-555-1234;tsp=terrifictelecom.com tel:+1-212-555-1234;tsp=terrifictelecom.com;phone-context=X-COMPANY-NE +T tel:+358-555-1234567;postd=pp22 tel:0w003585551234567;phone-context=+3585551234 tel:+1234567890;phone-context=+1234;vnd.company.option=foo tel:+1234567890;phone-context=+1234;vnd.company.option=%22foo%22 tel:+1234;option=%22!%22 tel:+1234;option=%22%5C%22%22 tel:+1234;option=%22%5C!%22 tel:+1234;option=%22bar%22 tel:+456-7890;phone-context=213;phone-context=213 tel:456-7890;phone-context=213;phone-context=213 tel:+123-456-789;isub=123(456) tel:+123456;postd=*** [download] For details, see RFC 2806. Abigail	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Phone reg expression by Anonymous Monk on Apr 18, 2003 at 23:00 UTC
Que?	[reply]
Re: Phone reg expression by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Apr 18, 2003 at 23:02 UTC
Re: Phone reg expression by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Apr 18, 2003 at 22:58 UTC
There are no patterns for phone numbers in Regexp::Common yet, for the simple reason I have not found a specification of phone numbers for any country yet. For instance, a regexp that allows for 7 or 11 digit phone numbers would be incorrect for the North America Plan, as that would reject for instance `911`. Abigail	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Phone reg expression by seattlejohn (Deacon) on Apr 20, 2003 at 19:34 UTC
For the obsessively curious, there's a lot of interesting (and apparently authoritative) information about U.S. and Canadian phone-number standards at NANPA, the North American Numbering Plan Adminstration. It covers arcana such as the so-called N11 numbers (911, 411, etc.), potentially valid area codes (`/2-90-80-9/`, except `/\d11/`, `/37\d/`, and `/96\d/`), vertical services codes (`112?\d\d` or `\*2?\d\d`), and so on. It even alludes to what will happen when North America eventually moves to 11-digit phone numbers (i.e., 4-digit area codes). Now there's a scary thought for anyone who's been writing phone-number validation code that assumes a 3-3-4 format. $perlmonks{seattlejohn} = 'John Clyman';	[reply]