Re: Re: Philosophical Perly Queues

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Philosophical Perly Queues by petesmiley (Friar) on Apr 18, 2003 at 17:48 UTC
and just to make sure it doesn't get reaped, it was intentional smiles	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Philosophical Perly Queues by benn (Vicar) on Apr 20, 2003 at 11:52 UTC
was that the sound of one scalar sorting? <g>	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Philosophical Perly Queues by Anonymous Monk on Apr 20, 2003 at 14:53 UTC
Actually, no scalars. Definitely no scalars. Which reminds me that plural sometimes means fewer than scalar. Don't believe me? Note how English uses an "s" to indicate plural? Well, the trailing s in "no scalars" above indicates that you have fewer than scalar. :-)	[reply]