in reply to Deconstruction: Geek Creedo JAPH
in thread Geek Creedo JAPH
Right on the money.
Here's the modified __DATA__ section to mollify those who agree with LAI:
0100000,0000100,0001100,0010001;1100001,0000101,0010011;1100011,001010 0;1100101,0001010,0001110,0010110;1101000,0001001,0010010;1001010,0000 000;1101011,0010101;1101100,0010000;1101110,0000110;1101111,0000111;10 10000,0001101;1110010,0001011,0001111,0010111;1110011,0000010;1110100, 0000011,0001000;1110101,0000001;00001101,0011000;00001010,0011001;
The following observation is not intended to offend, irk, or otherwise inflame the indignation of fellow monks, especially LAI.
I was a little disappointed that since Jul 02, 2002 at 12:10 GMT+4, LAI has written six replies/deconstructions of obfu's, yet none of his own. I am always a little more impressed when prior effort is put forth before a critique.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Deconstruction: Geek Creedo JAPH
by LAI (Hermit) on Apr 24, 2003 at 16:39 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: Deconstruction: Geek Creedo JAPH
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 25, 2003 at 10:41 UTC |