in reply to Care to explain ++@h{@a,@b,@c,@d}; ?
in thread Find unique elements from multiple arrays

The @h{@a,@b,@c,@d} syntax is a hash slice and it returns a list of all values in %hash that corresponds to keys represented by the array elements. It will auto-vivify elements that do not exist (hence your "uninitiliazed value" warnings). The preincrement operator is apparently taking the final element of the list and incrementing it. In other words, this is an obfuscated way of incrementing a single hash value, but with the side effect of auto-vivifying others. The following code snippet demonstrates:

use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dumper; $Data::Dumper::Indent = 1; my %hash = ( foo => 1, bar => 2, baz => 3, quux => 4 ); my @a = qw(foo bar asdf); my @b = qw(baz); ++@hash{@a,@b}; print Dumper \%hash;

That auto-vivifies $h{asdf} and increments $h{baz} to 4.

Cheers,
Ovid

New address of my CGI Course.
Silence is Evil (feel free to copy and distribute widely - note copyright text)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Care to explain ++@h{@a,@b,@c,@d}; ?
by diotalevi (Canon) on Apr 28, 2003 at 18:51 UTC

    And here I just thought that BrowserUK had made a mistake by applying the scalar context to the hash slice. I would have been quite happy if it had been been written as @h{@a,@b,@c,@d} = () since that is clear on maintaining the list/list context. It also assigns "nothing" to each hash which is correct. So I'd use it in the amended form for production code.