in reply to Re: (2) Proportional Reputation (avoid encouraging controversy for it's own sake)
in thread Proportional Reputation

> encouraging controversy for controversy's sake.

...and yet, I have to say that there is a valid distinction between a reputation 12 node that has been voted on a mere 12 times, and one that has garnered 100 votes, with a mild bias in favor of the good.

This distinction may be illuminating, but of course we must also keep in mind that we don't see a node's reputation until after we've made a decision about it ourselves.

...All the world looks like -well- all the world, when your hammer is Perl.
---v

  • Comment on Re: Re: (2) Proportional Reputation (avoid encouraging controversy for it's own sake)