Re: Re: XML::UPS

Hell yeah (give it a shot, great strategy, unless you got cash and like giving it away ;))!

Also, XML::UPS is a very poor choice for the module name. I'm thinking along the lines of Business::UPS::XML or Business::UPS2 or Business::UPS::SOAP, whichever makes most sense ;)

MJD says you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!
I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6x+5.8x. I take requests.
** The Third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

Comment on Re: Re: XML::UPS

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: XML::UPS by Alexander (Sexton) on May 04, 2003 at 00:19 UTC
Point taken about the module name. Hence I ditched the thread title in favor of XML & The United Parcel Service, Inc. ...ofcourse I managed to fudge that thread title up aswell. (I accidentally said Postal instead of Parcel. ~~ Ok, so I goofed. Call it brain flatulance.) ;-)	[reply]
SOAP - Re: Re: Re: XML::UPS by Alexander (Sexton) on May 04, 2003 at 01:09 UTC
Your mention of SOAP nearly escaped my attention. When I first read your reply, I thought SOAP was like you saying Pizza/(Insert your word here). Then I read diotalevi's reply to my other thread where he mentions the USPS SOAP server. Naturally that caught my attention. It seems I must investigate SOAP servers and try to find out if UPS is using a SOAP server. Thank you for your mention of it.	[reply]