Thank you. :)
Can I do this?
# in Foo::run()...
lock(@aryItems);
delete($aryItems[$id]);
cond_signal($aryItems);
Here is the reference I used
-P0w3rK!d | [reply] [d/l] |
You shouldn't need the call to cond_signal(...) unless you are trying to deliberately meter the flow of your threads (a bad idea in most cases), or possible if you are going to need to re-access the same variable later at the same scope, Otherwise, and in most cases, you only need to let the lock go out of scope for the shared variable to become unlocked.
Also, you (probably) shouldn't be locking the whole array, just the element that you want to access.
sub run {
my $self = Foo->new(@_);
my $id = $self->{id};
...
print "Hello from thread $id.\n";
lock($aryItems[$id]);
print "Item $aryItems[$id]\n";
delete $aryItems[$id];
# The lock is removed once when the function returns
return 1;
}
There is a caveat of using delete, unlike with splice the array element is not removed, it is effectively just undefed.
It is difficult to be more specific without understanding more about what it is that your code is trying to achieve. I realise that you probably just exploring the possibilities at the moment, but there are different ways of using threads depending upon your ultimate goal.
Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
# PSEUDOCODE
...
our $MAXTHREADS = 5;
our @aryItems : shared;
...
main();
sub main {...}
sub process {
my $threads = 0;
my $files = (@aryItems);
if ($files > $MAXTHREADS) {
$threads = $MAXTHREADS;
}
initThreads($threads, ...);
...
}
sub initThreads {
...
my $threads = 0;
...
($threads, ...) = @_;
our @threads = ();
for (0..$threads - 1) {
push @threads, threads->new(
\&Foo::run,
id => $_,
...
);
}
}
...
####
Foo class
####
package Foo;
use threads;
use threads::shared;
...
sub new{...};
sub run{<processing and locking code goes here>};
-P0w3rK!d
| [reply] [d/l] |
BrowserUK,
This did not work. I locked a single array element as you suggested.
Hello from thread 0.
Item 400.xml
thread failed to start: lock can only be used on shared values at foo.
+pl line 1036.
Hello from thread 1.
Item 1159.xml
thread failed to start: lock can only be used on shared values at foo.
+pl line 1036.
Hello from thread 2.
Item 1175.xml
thread failed to start: lock can only be used on shared values at foo.
+pl line 1036.
-P0w3rK!d :) | [reply] [d/l] |