Re: require without the exec

May be i'm wrong but, if you put '1;' as the last line in a perl module you prevent it from being executed?

Comment on Re: require without the exec

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: require without the exec by little (Curate) on May 23, 2003 at 17:43 UTC
... You probably are. See require for the why ... `The file must return true as the last statement to indicate successful execution of any initialization code, so it's customary to end such a file with 1; unless you're sure it'll return true otherwise. But it's better just to put the 1;, in case you add more statements.` Have a nice day All decision is left to your taste	[reply]