Re: Readmore tags enforcement

Just... no. I like the way things are with the readmore's right now. The implementation is perfect, as it requires the author to insert them manually. Why is this good? Because I choose where my readmore's go. And I like it that way. Nah, it's all good for now.

If the above content is missing any vital points or you feel that any of the information is misleading, incorrect or irrelevant, please feel free to downvote the post. At the same time, please reply to this node or /msg me to inform me as to what is wrong with the post, so that I may update the node to the best of my ability.

Comment on Re: Readmore tags enforcement

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Readmore tags enforcement by jonnyfolk (Vicar) on May 27, 2003 at 18:45 UTC
But Coruscate I can't imagine that you would choose to hog the stage with fifty lines of data. But either way it's just a thought, not a deal.	[reply]
Re: Re: Readmore tags enforcement by PetaMem (Priest) on May 30, 2003 at 12:47 UTC
I think that if this algorithm/heuristics leaves a node untouched if it encounters ANYWHERE a readmore tag the automatism would be perfect IMHO. If there's anywhere a readmore tag, the author seemingly not only knows about it, but also uses it. So no automatism. If someone does not use Readmore tags and the automatism bites him by placing it somewhere where he doesn't want it to be - well a great learning effect to use it next time. Bye PetaMem	[reply]