Re: CPAN Module Proposal: Business::Ship

The API looks straightforward. I haven't taken the time to digest the internals, so I can't comment on that. The name is ambiguous and rather vague as is; I'd call it Business::ShippingCost, as that's its goal.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Comment on Re: CPAN Module Proposal: Business::Ship

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: CPAN Module Proposal: Business::Ship by danb (Friar) on Jun 01, 2003 at 16:15 UTC
What kind of namespace would you recommend based on the other features I'm planning (here)	[reply]
Re^3: CPAN Module Proposal: Business::Ship by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jun 01, 2003 at 16:57 UTC
Business::Shipping is fine then I guess. "Ship" is ambiguous - I briefly wondered what the node was going to be about before I got to it. Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re: Re^3: CPAN Module Proposal: Business::Ship by danb (Friar) on Jun 03, 2003 at 09:23 UTC
Thanks Aristotle, I'm going with Business::Shipping. Now, no one will confuse it with... Business::Ship, the rocket ship simulator. or... Business::Ship, the module for sail manufacturers. :-) -Dan	[reply]