in reply to Re: Concurrent access to temporary and persistant storage
in thread Concurrent access to temporary and persistant storage

If you didn't need persistence, I would point you at IPC:MM, which has unbeatable performance.
And that would disregard the portability requirement.
...These are faster than SQLite.
But neither speaks SQL. You should only consider SQLite if your aim is to have a RDMS.
  • Comment on Re: Re: Concurrent access to temporary and persistant storage

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Concurrent access to temporary and persistant storage
by perrin (Chancellor) on Jun 03, 2003 at 22:29 UTC
    How do you know IPC::MM isn't portable? Ralf Engelschall's mm (which it is based on) was developed to provide portable shared memory for apache.

    hacker is the one who brought up SQLite. I'm just telling him how it performs relative to these other choices.

[reply]
      It will not compile/run on win32 -- not portable
[reply]

In Section Meditations