RE: randomness (Plz rescue a node)

Explanations of Randomness strikes me as a node that required a lot of work. It certainly does not deserve a negative reputation, unless I am really missing something.

Good place for a vote, methinks.

Russ
Brainbench 'Most Valuable Professional' for Perl

Comment on RE: randomness (Plz rescue a node)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: randomness (Plz rescue a node) by johannz (Hermit) on Aug 05, 2000 at 03:09 UTC
I appreciate your pointing out the fact that this node had been voted down. It was deserving of positive votes. I am curious also why this node was voted down; there was nothing in the node that deserved to be voted down. If some of the people that voted this node down could comment on why it was voted down, it would be useful information and would promote a discussion of the post rather than risk the post disappearing off the deep end.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

RE: RE: randomness (Plz rescue a node)
by johannz (Hermit) on Aug 05, 2000 at 03:09 UTC

I appreciate your pointing out the fact that this node had been voted down. It was deserving of positive votes.

I am curious also why this node was voted down; there was nothing in the node that deserved to be voted down. If some of the people that voted this node down could comment on why it was voted down, it would be useful information and would promote a discussion of the post rather than risk the post disappearing off the deep end.

[reply]