Re: (jeffa) Re: Pseduo code planning

<rant>

Sorry, but I feel I have to downvote this.. If it was me that had asked the question, I'd be pretty peeved at someone trying to solve it for me.. (Especially if my point was to try and learn something for myself.) Suggestions and pointing out errors I can understand.. But actually writing the code.. *shakes her head* ..

.oO( And then there are the posts that actually *want* code, and nobody provides any, because they should 'do it themselves'.. I don't get it..)

</rant>

Comment on Re: (jeffa) Re: Pseduo code planning

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: (jeffa) Re: Pseduo code planning by vek (Prior) on Jun 07, 2003 at 17:15 UTC
You seem to be complaining that jeffa wrote some code. Well, yes he did, but he also did a good job with the pseudo code (as the OP requested). If you really want to write the code yourself you still can. Yes jeffa provided some code but you don't have to use it do you? I mean you can still take a stab at writing it yourself using your pseudo code as a guide surely. Am I missing something? -- vek --	[reply]
(jeffa) 4Re: Pseduo code planning by jeffa (Bishop) on Jun 07, 2003 at 18:13 UTC
I am with castaway on this one. I don't think she downvoted me because i gave away the solution, but instead she downvoted me for the manner in which i gave away the solution. All i had was a `<readmore>` tag ... i gave no clue that my solution was behind the curtain. bad jeffa ;) And thanks for the kind words. jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)	[reply]