in reply to Catching m// with Safe.pm

I think you may have hit upon a bug where the opmask (which controls which ops are allowed) flips too many bits as it were and allows more ops than it should (the permit sub does have a comment saying it needs more testing ...). It would be a good idea to send off an e-mail to the good folk of p5p who revel in this sort of low-level opcode munging.
HTH

_________
broquaint

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Catching m// with Safe.pm
by bobn (Chaplain) on Jul 16, 2003 at 13:37 UTC

    Bugreport sent 4 July 2003, ack'd on 14 July 2003.

    --Bob Niederman, http://bob-n.com

      As of Jul 17, "Fixed In 5.8.1-RC1"

      --Bob Niederman, http://bob-n.com