in reply to OT: Spam protection
Wow. What a tough problem. It's also one that I'll have to try to deal with in a few years so I especially appreciate you paving the way. ;-)
I think the use of SpamAssassin and Mozilla is a good starting point.
I have the same reservations about automated replies that BrowserUk voiced. But if you do go that route, FIGlet might not be the best choice. A figlet "encoded" string might be almost decipherable to someone who views it in something other than a fixed width font.
-sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: OT: Spam protection
by t0mas (Priest) on Jun 10, 2003 at 09:35 UTC |