I think that the best thing to do would be to change the lines 96-97 from

            ? eval { [$target->$as(@$args)] }
            : eval {  $target->$as(@$args)  };
[download]

to

            ? [$target->$as(@$args)]
            : $target->$as(@$args);
[download]

I think the eval simply doesn't belong there. We know that the method does exist already thanks to the

return unless eval { $target->can($as) };
[download]

above and if the method feels like throwing an exception I don't think the Class::Delegate should interfere. I think we should ask TheDamian why is the eval{} there.

Jenda
Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live.
   -- Rick Osborne

Edit by castaway: Closed small tag in signature