Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: threads and RAM-Usage

Wow, I wish I had a more of your patience and tenacity.

Anyhows, on a FreeBSD box I have a threaded perl compiled and I'm able to have at leat 1000 threads running simultaneously with no problems.

Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: threads and RAM-Usage

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: threads and RAM-Usage by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 15, 2003 at 18:50 UTC
Interesting. So the limitation isn't Win32 itself, nor threads.pm in general, but some intereaction between the two. Thanks for the info. Now I know that I only need look at the `#ifdef WIN32...` bits of threads.pm to find out where this limit of 120 is coming from.... at least theoretically. Examine what is said, not who speaks. "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham "When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: threads and RAM-Usage
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 15, 2003 at 18:50 UTC

Interesting. So the limitation isn't Win32 itself, nor threads.pm in general, but some intereaction between the two. Thanks for the info. Now I know that I only need look at the #ifdef WIN32... bits of threads.pm to find out where this limit of 120 is coming from.... at least theoretically.

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller

[reply]
[d/l]