in reply to Re: Re: Why XSLT and not just Perl?
in thread Why XSLT and not just Perl?
Since you bring it up - I though that XSLT was normally handled by SAX which I didn't think would be normally fed into a tree structure. Or is XSLT going to always be stuck with the DOM problem of having to have everything in memory all at once to satisfy random access?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why XSLT and not just Perl?
by mirod (Canon) on Jun 17, 2003 at 01:50 UTC | |
by diotalevi (Canon) on Jun 17, 2003 at 03:48 UTC | |
by gellyfish (Monsignor) on Jun 17, 2003 at 10:26 UTC | |
by mirod (Canon) on Jun 17, 2003 at 04:18 UTC |