in reply to Re: Namespace for libwv wrapper class?
in thread Namespace for libwv wrapper class?

I am not experienced in this CPAN logic but I believe that Microsoft has left clear that they should be considered as a 'different' namespace :).

That is, they are never subscribing to any standard that they don't create or modify in a non-standard way. Don't you think?

What ever the logic that might apply to CPAN modules, the best way to manage all would be to reflect reality.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Namespace for libwv wrapper class?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Namespace for libwv wrapper class?
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jun 22, 2003 at 18:55 UTC
    That doesn't make any sense. It is not up to Microsoft to name this module, nor is the library behind it written by them. Why in the world would we adopt the same practices we dislike for things we create just because they happen to be in some way tangential to Microsoft?

    Makeshifts last the longest.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom