in reply to Re: Re: Re: AutoMagic HTML
in thread AutoMagic HTML

Trying it a few different ways and testing it out with Benchmark is the best way to know for sure.

My intuition is that you'll go faster with smaller "bites", since you'll be slinging less data around, so I would suspect that reading it in a line at a time, then using a special sub or state when you need multiline input, would be fastest. But that's just a guess...