in reply to Re: Curious Observation with File::Copy;
in thread Curious Observation with File::Copy;

That's a good point. However, since this is a production server, I cannot reboot it. Although it was rebooted yesterday. I don't think the network is going to be much of an issue because the directories I'm copying between are local to the server on which I'm testing. I'm making a rough guess on the times, because I had the program that transferred the files record the start and stop times into a file. I think that there might be a +/- of 1-2 minutes in the times but we also sat and marked time with a stopwatch as well because we didn't believe that there could be that much discrepency in the times. I just ran the tests again this morning while the system was relatively quiet and there is not a lot going on on that server anyway.


"Ex libris un peut de tout"
  • Comment on Re: Re: Curious Observation with File::Copy;

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Curious Observation with File::Copy;
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Jun 27, 2003 at 13:33 UTC
    You are doing performance testing on a production server? I find that mind boggling. Anyway, why don't you perform the tests in a test environment, or even your development environment? I'm not quite sure what you mean by the directories being local to the server - you were copying stuff from one machine to another using NFS, weren't you?

    Abigail

      It is a bit mind-boggling I admit but we don't have a good test environment at the moment with which to run this particular test. What I mean by the NFS is simply this: we have a directory say /path/to/test and a second directory /path/to/another/test. Both these directories are on ServerA. NFS comes in because another/test is being exported to ServerB with NFS.
      "Ex libris un peut de tout"
        So, what are you testing? A copy from /path/to/test to /path/to/another/test, all done on ServerA? In that case, NFS doesn't come in at all.

        Abigail