in reply to Monastery Mores
> I'm afraid that people will find this post ambiguous or superfluous because it doesn't directly stake out a position on, attempt to resolve, or even address some epic conflict that they personally care about.
I found your post to be a thoughtful read, full of much good advice for everyone here to follow, and not superfluous at all. One doesn't have to take a stand or choose sides to resolve a problem, on the contrary: the best mediators are often those who remain the most neutral.
> ...I don't know if the amount backstabbing, bitterness, and open hostility on Perl Monks is typical...
Actually, the only place I really have an issue with what you're saying here is this. The events that tilly has relayed may or may not be true. The site admin, St. vroom checked the voting records and apparently this did not happen. Our happy medium, neshura (read her stance on this particular issue) has been investigating with tilly and vroom. I have not heard any further news from her at this point, but hopefully (hint, hint) she'll post an update soon. Ozymandias has made some very good arguments against (I hate to say 'against', but he truly is playing the role of Devil's Advocate) tilly's case here and here.
To summarize most of the above linked posts, tilly feels singled out and purposefully voted down because of a post he made in response to mt2k's Goodbye! post. Mathematically speaking, however, it is very difficult for one person to make much of an impact because of how the voting system is set up. However, if such a thing truly happened, it is indicative of the growing clique atomosphere (btrott has an excellent read about this) and 'ill-health' you have described for us. This is no doubt a Bad Thing. However, due to the growing user base, and The Way People Are, I do not believe there is much we can do about it. Or even, for that matter, that "we" SHOULD do something about it.
While it's true there was an issue with merlyn (read "Running with scissors") last week, that has long since been resolved and we are very happy to have him back and hackin'. There is also currently an issue with mt2k, and who knows where that stands.
> Here's hoping that this post will generate comment from all the Perl Monks, and that we will be civil while discussing civility.
Constructive, yes. Civil remains to be seen. :-) My only regret so far is that you posted this as Anonymous Monk, so I have no idea who you are!
Alakaboo
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
RE: (Monday Night Monkball: Recap) RE: Monastery Mores
by tilly (Archbishop) on Aug 09, 2000 at 19:54 UTC |