in reply to Generating A Hash Value

When you say "using int arithmetic"; signed or unsigned? 32-bit?

Could you supply the hash value generated for "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" so that we may have something to check our attempts against.

This might be close, and reasonable efficient as it avoids the exponentiation by processing the string backwards and accumulating the exponent, and uses integer math. However truncating to 32-bits in reverse order maybe screwing up the result?

#! perl -slw use strict; # s[0]*31^(n-1)+s[1]*31^(n-2)+ ... +s[n-1] sub JavaHash { use integer; my ($s) = @_; my $n = length $s; my @s = unpack 'C*', $s; my $hash = 0; my $p = 1; for ( reverse @s ) { print "$hash : $_: $p"; $hash += $_ * $p; $p *= 31; } return $hash; } die 'No arguments' unless @ARGV; printf '%10d:%s' , JavaHash( $_ ), $_ for @ARGV;

Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller